April 30, 2024

Understanding Passive vs. Active Rooftop Fall Protection

At W.S. Safety Technologies, we take a client-centred approach to industrial safety, always prioritizing a deep understanding of our customers’ specific needs and concerns before recommending any fall protection system. Though both passive and active fall protection systems play crucial roles in maintaining workplace safety, our extensive experience and field observations often lead us to favour passive systems when possible. This article delves into the nuances of passive versus active fall protection systems, explaining their differences and discussing why passive solutions are typically more advantageous.

What is Active Fall Protection?

Active fall protection systems require the worker to actively engage with the equipment designed to mitigate falls. These systems are characterized by components like safety harnesses, lanyards, retractable lifelines, and sophisticated fall arrest systems. Active fall protection is essential in environments where workers are exposed to fall risks while needing mobility to perform their tasks at various heights. Key characteristics include:

  • Continuous Engagement: Workers must regularly check and adjust their equipment to ensure safety.
  • Training Requirements: Extensive training is mandatory to familiarize workers with correct equipment usage and safety protocols.
  • Dynamic Use: Ideal for environments where workers move across different levels and platforms.

What is Passive Fall Protection?

Passive fall protection systems do not require active participation from the worker, thereby reducing the risk of human error. These systems include installations like guardrails, safety nets, and robust covers for openings and hazardous areas. They are designed to provide a safe working environment through structural safety solutions. Advantages of passive systems include:

  • Inherent Safety: By eliminating the need for worker interaction with safety mechanisms, these systems provide constant protection.
  • Lower Training Requirements: With fewer complexities, passive systems require less specialized training, speeding up the onboarding process for new workers.
  • Permanent Solutions: Once installed, passive systems offer long-term safety without the need for frequent adjustments or alignments.
 
Safety Rail 2000 on roof corner

Key Differences Between Passive and Active Rooftop Safety Systems

Worker Involvement

Active fall protection necessitates that workers actively engage with and correctly utilize safety equipment. Conversely, passive fall protection operates effectively without any active involvement from the workers, as it does not require them to interact with the system to benefit from its protection.

Ease of Use

Passive systems are generally simpler to use and require less training because they consist of straightforward physical barriers or structures, such as guardrails. On the other hand, active systems often demand more comprehensive training and a greater level of expertise to ensure they are used properly and effectively.

Flexibility

Active fall protection systems can limit mobility, confining a user to the length of a lanyard or a self-retracting lifeline that must be attached to an anchor. In contrast, passive systems, such as guardrails installed around maintenance areas like RTU units, allow for unrestricted access and movement around the equipment. Additionally, active systems require a rescue plan and the availability of specialized equipment to manage potential incidents, which can complicate the use and increase the risk of accidents like tripping over securing ropes or lanyards.

Cost and Maintenance

Passive fall protection systems typically involve lower initial costs and less ongoing maintenance. Active systems, however, include equipment that must be regularly inspected and maintained. For instance, active fall arrest systems need annual inspections by a qualified professional, adding to the overall costs and administrative burden of maintaining up-to-date inspection records. Moreover, if a worker damages the equipment in a fall, the replacement costs can be substantial, particularly as older models are phased out by manufacturers. In contrast, passive systems, such as guardrails, rarely incur damage from regular use, thereby minimizing repair and replacement expenses.

Effectiveness

Both active and passive fall protection systems offer high levels of effectiveness when implemented correctly. The success of each system is dependent on factors such as the specific conditions of the workplace, the nature of the tasks being performed, and adherence to relevant safety standards and regulations. Each system has its unique advantages that can be better suited to different environments and requirements.

A Few Illustrative Case Studies

While both active and passive fall protection systems have their advantages and drawbacks, certain situations may make one system more favourable or even the only viable option. To truly understand the effectiveness of these two solutions, let’s take a look at a few situations that can provide clearer insights into which is more advantageous depending on the circumstances.

Servicing Rooftop HVAC Equipment

When an HVAC technician needs to access equipment on a rooftop, there are several methods to ensure safe access. One approach involves installing roof anchors to which the technician must connect using a harness and lanyard. This method requires the technician to be trained in the safe use of this equipment, which must be in good repair and regularly inspected. The technician must also ensure that the harness fits properly, the lanyard is the correct length, and the anchors are safe for use. Additionally, all equipment must meet inspection standards.

In contrast, a guardrail system simplifies the process significantly. If the area is protected by guardrails, the technician simply walks over to the equipment and works safely behind the guardrail. This eliminates the need to don a harness, check the currency of anchor inspections, and manage the risks associated with tripping over a loose lanyard or being restricted in movement.

In this scenario, while both systems are viable, guardrails offer a more straightforward and less labour-intensive solution. This not only reduces the liability for the company but may also prove more cost-effective if it allows the technician to complete their work more efficiently. For examples of effective rooftop guardrail systems, visit W.S. Safety Technologies Rooftop Guardrails.

Offloading Flatbed Trucks and Railcars

In certain scenarios, such as offloading flatbed trucks and railcars, only one type of fall protection system may be feasible. Workers accessing the tops of these vehicles for tasks like securing cargo, moving materials, or inspecting hatches encounter varying work surfaces, making the installation of permanent or temporary guardrails impractical.

For these situations, an overhead anchor point system is essential. Typically, this involves a rigid rail and trolley system. The worker wears a harness connected to a self-retracting lifeline attached to a trolley that moves along the beam. This setup allows the worker freedom of movement across the vehicle top, while the trolley follows seamlessly. Should a fall occur, the system is designed to arrest the fall promptly, significantly reducing the risk of serious injury or death.

In the context of flatbed truck and railcar offloading, an active fall protection system is not just the best option—it is often the only viable one.

Warehouse Rooftops with RTU/HVAC Equipment

We recently completed an extensive project for a client responsible for managing multiple warehouse buildings, one of which featured about 70 skylights, regularly spaced. These buildings require frequent access to rooftop services such as RTU/HVAC systems, which pose significant safety challenges. The presence of numerous skylights, none of which are rated to withstand the impact of a fall, introduces considerable fall hazards.

Initially, one might consider installing cable fall arrest systems or rooftop anchors to secure the area. However, the vast expanse of these rooftops would require numerous anchors, increasing the risk of roof leaks if not installed correctly. Moreover, such installations could potentially void any existing rooftop warranties by compromising the roofing membrane.

Faced with these challenges, our team explored alternative solutions to enhance safety without jeopardizing the roof’s integrity. One option involved surrounding each skylight with non-penetrating guardrails. While effective, this solution would significantly increase both the cost and weight burden on the rooftop structure.

Ultimately, the chosen solution was to install skylight fall protection screens across all skylights. These screens feature a clamp-on design, which requires no drilling or penetration of the roof, thus preserving the roofing material and existing warranties. Additionally, non-penetrating rails were installed along the roof edges to provide further protection.

This approach allowed technicians to move safely across the rooftop without the risk of accidental falls through the skylights. While both passive and active systems were considered, the passive solution of installing skylight screens and guardrails was deemed most appropriate for its efficacy and minimal impact on the building structure. For more details on the types of skylight protection systems we use, visit W.S. Safety Technologies Skylight Protection.

Why Passive Systems Often Outshine Active Systems

Our preference for passive fall protection is driven by its ability to provide consistent, reliable safety with minimal human intervention. These systems are particularly effective in environments where the risk of falls is constant and where worker mobility is not severely restricted by active protective measures. Additionally, the straightforward nature of passive systems significantly reduces the training requirements and operational costs, which are critical factors in their widespread adoption in various industrial settings.

While both active and passive fall protection systems are essential for comprehensive industrial safety, the simplicity, cost efficiency, and reduced liability associated with passive systems make them a favoured choice in many scenarios, particularly in fixed work environments like rooftops and large facilities.

 Contact us today for a custom quote or to discuss your individual needs– https://wssafety.com/quote
[ws_related_products]
Did you enjoy this article?
If so, make sure to like our Facebook page or follow us on LinkedIn to be notified as we add more!
Share this
W.S. Safety Offers:
Expert Advice
Quick Turnaround Times
Quality Product
A Fully Certified Product and Crew
IF YOU LIKED THAT ONE, CHECK THESE OUT

Related Posts

Want to Speak to the experts themselves?

×
×

Cart